BGonline.org Forums

NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...

Posted By: Stick
Date: Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 2:33 p.m.

In Response To: NOT a contentious clock question, but instead... (Chuck Bower)

Any meth addict who passes up hitting here can buy my next meal.

Any coke head who slots the 5pt after hitting can buy my next hooker. (that's you Bill, you know how I like them)

With those thoughts out of the way and accepting hitting as mandatory we're left with 22/18, 13/9, 8/4. 8/4 is a tasty treat that can't be beat and also my play.

I would expound but I've revised those 3 short sentences 3 times now and found many faults, so perhaps some H2O and about 8 hours sleep then we'll expound after the rollout backs me up.

Stick...the preview button is geniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiius

Messages In This Thread

• NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
  Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 11 February 2009, at 9:08 p.m.
  • NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
    Bill Riles -- Wednesday, 11 February 2009, at 9:31 p.m.
  • NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
    John O'Hagan -- Wednesday, 11 February 2009, at 10:32 p.m.
  • NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
    garyo -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 1:48 a.m.
    • NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
      mamabear -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 3:59 a.m.
  • NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
    Stein Kulseth -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 9:21 a.m.
  • Still time to voice your opinion...
    Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 2:14 p.m.
  • NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
    Stick -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 2:33 p.m.
    • NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
      Bill Riles -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 2:45 p.m.
  • NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
    Coolrey -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 3:18 p.m.
    • NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
      Stick -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 3:20 p.m.
    • NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
      Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 4:32 p.m.
    • NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
      neilkaz -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 6:41 p.m.
  • NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
    neilkaz -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 3:46 p.m.
  • RO
    Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 6:06 p.m.
    • RO
      John O'Hagan -- Friday, 13 February 2009, at 2:56 p.m.