BGonline.org Forums

NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...

Posted By: neilkaz
Date: Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 3:46 p.m.

In Response To: NOT a contentious clock question, but instead... (Chuck Bower)

Hit and wimpy 8/4 with a big advanatage anyhow and leaving some bad entering shots for White but few jokers.

Messages In This Thread

• NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
  Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 11 February 2009, at 9:08 p.m.
  • NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
    Bill Riles -- Wednesday, 11 February 2009, at 9:31 p.m.
  • NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
    John O'Hagan -- Wednesday, 11 February 2009, at 10:32 p.m.
  • NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
    garyo -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 1:48 a.m.
    • NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
      mamabear -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 3:59 a.m.
  • NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
    Stein Kulseth -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 9:21 a.m.
  • Still time to voice your opinion...
    Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 2:14 p.m.
  • NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
    Stick -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 2:33 p.m.
    • NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
      Bill Riles -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 2:45 p.m.
  • NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
    Coolrey -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 3:18 p.m.
    • NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
      Stick -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 3:20 p.m.
    • NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
      Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 4:32 p.m.
    • NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
      neilkaz -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 6:41 p.m.
  • NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
    neilkaz -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 3:46 p.m.
  • RO
    Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 6:06 p.m.
    • RO
      John O'Hagan -- Friday, 13 February 2009, at 2:56 p.m.