| |
BGonline.org Forums
Pittsburgh recube action
Posted By: Matt Cohn-Geier In Response To: Pittsburgh recube action (neilkaz)
Date: Tuesday, 24 February 2009, at 1:50 a.m.
Also, don't even dream of using GNU 2-ply cube to roll out this position-type.
I can see 2-ply taking passes later if it doesn't double now. But do you think 2-ply cube or 3-ply cube will roll out the D/T equity better, or does it make a difference?
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.