BGonline.org Forums
Pittsburgh recube action
Posted By: Matt Cohn-Geier
Date: Tuesday, 24 February 2009, at 10:50 a.m.
In Response To: Pittsburgh recube action (MaX)
2-ply cube doesn't understand this position type very well and greatly underestimates White's side, 3-ply gets closer to the right answer in positions like this (possibly by luck but it works).
Messages In This Thread
- Pittsburgh recube action
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Tuesday, 24 February 2009, at 12:49 a.m.
- Pittsburgh recube action
neilkaz -- Tuesday, 24 February 2009, at 1:46 a.m.
- Pittsburgh recube action
David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 24 February 2009, at 5:03 a.m.
- Pittsburgh recube action
Neil Robins -- Tuesday, 24 February 2009, at 8:23 a.m.
- Pittsburgh recube action
Sam Pottle -- Tuesday, 24 February 2009, at 10:45 a.m.
- Pittsburgh recube action
neilkaz -- Tuesday, 24 February 2009, at 1:19 p.m.
- Pittsburgh recube action
Rich Munitz -- Tuesday, 24 February 2009, at 3:30 p.m.
- Pittsburgh recube action Rollout
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Tuesday, 24 February 2009, at 11:05 p.m.
- Pittsburgh recube action
Coolrey -- Wednesday, 25 February 2009, at 12:19 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.