BGonline.org Forums

we need a lot more Al Fallers

Posted By: Coolrey
Date: Wednesday, 25 February 2009, at 1:34 a.m.

In Response To: we need a lot more Al Fallers (Bill Riles)

Hey man, I was laughing when he won games with 35-1 shots...

So I would have not been happy if he beat me after I got a lead, but I would have been philosphical. I have come to realize that all I can do is make it hard for my opponents to beat me. So, I have done well if they get up apologizing like Matt Reklaitis did, (whether he ought to have or not). Al had some luck, but not enough against me.

In all fairness to the other guys who played him as he was establishing his "legend" I will say that I was forewarned. I had a night to sleep on how to deal with what I might be up against. Others, unknowingly stepped on the bear trap that was Al. Had they been aprised of the situation perhaps they would have been better able to use their experience and savvy to come up with a slightly better overall strategy vs. Al. Mine worked, but I don't think I want to see the Gnu evaluation of that match!

Messages In This Thread

• Congrats to Pittsburgh BGOnliners
  Bill Riles -- Monday, 23 February 2009, at 3:53 a.m.
  • Congrats to Pittsburgh BGOnliners
    Coolrey -- Monday, 23 February 2009, at 9:13 a.m.
    • Congrats to Pittsburgh BGOnliners
      Bill Riles -- Monday, 23 February 2009, at 2:52 p.m.
    • we need a lot more Al Fallers
      Chuck Bower -- Monday, 23 February 2009, at 3:27 p.m.
      • we need a lot more Al Fallers
        Bill Riles -- Monday, 23 February 2009, at 3:34 p.m.
        • we need a lot more Al Fallers
          Coolrey -- Wednesday, 25 February 2009, at 1:34 a.m.
      • we need a lot more Al Fallers
        Matt Cohn-Geier -- Monday, 23 February 2009, at 9:38 p.m.
        • we need a lot more Al Fallers
          Chuck Bower -- Monday, 23 February 2009, at 11:01 p.m.
          • we need a lot more Al Fallers
            Matt Cohn-Geier -- Monday, 23 February 2009, at 11:30 p.m.
            • we need a lot more Al Fallers
              Rich Munitz -- Tuesday, 24 February 2009, at 2:09 a.m.
            • thought experiment
              Chuck Bower -- Tuesday, 24 February 2009, at 5:37 p.m.
              • thought experiment
                Barry Silliman -- Thursday, 26 February 2009, at 1:24 a.m.
                • thought experiment
                  Rich Munitz -- Thursday, 26 February 2009, at 4:26 a.m.
                  • thought experiment
                    Coolrey -- Friday, 27 February 2009, at 8:43 p.m.
                • thought experiment
                  Chuck Bower -- Sunday, 1 March 2009, at 5:12 p.m.
      • we need a lot more Al Fallers
        neilkaz -- Tuesday, 24 February 2009, at 12:36 a.m.
      • we need a lot more Al Fallers
        Coolrey -- Wednesday, 25 February 2009, at 1:00 a.m.
        • we need a lot more Al Fallers
          Matt Cohn-Geier -- Wednesday, 25 February 2009, at 1:08 a.m.
          • we need a lot more Al Fallers
            Coolrey -- Wednesday, 25 February 2009, at 1:23 a.m.
    • Congrats to Pittsburgh BGOnliners
      Barry Silliman -- Thursday, 26 February 2009, at 12:53 a.m.
      • Congrats to Pittsburgh BGOnliners
        Coolrey -- Friday, 27 February 2009, at 5:25 p.m.
  • Congrats to Pittsburgh BGOnliners
    Bill Riles -- Monday, 23 February 2009, at 2:11 p.m.
    • Congrats to Pittsburgh BGOnliners
      Chuck Bower -- Monday, 23 February 2009, at 3:14 p.m.
      • Let's not forget...
        Chuck Bower -- Monday, 23 February 2009, at 4:41 p.m.
        • Let's not forget...
          Coolrey -- Wednesday, 25 February 2009, at 12:31 a.m.
      • Congrats to Pittsburgh BGOnliners
        Barry Silliman -- Thursday, 26 February 2009, at 1:35 a.m.
        • Congrats to Pittsburgh BGOnliners
          Rich Munitz -- Thursday, 26 February 2009, at 4:32 a.m.
          • Congrats to Pittsburgh BGOnliners
            Coolrey -- Friday, 27 February 2009, at 5:34 p.m.
  • Congrats to Pittsburgh BGOnliners
    neilkaz -- Monday, 23 February 2009, at 4:47 p.m.