BGonline.org Forums
Pittsburgh recube action
Posted By: Barry Silliman
Date: Thursday, 26 February 2009, at 1:47 a.m.
In Response To: Pittsburgh recube action (Sam Pottle)
Since almost 48 hours has passed since this was posted, am I within bounds to note that the spare on the 2-point is most certainly not a defect when your next roll is 5-1? :-)
Messages In This Thread
- Pittsburgh recube action
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Tuesday, 24 February 2009, at 12:49 a.m.
- Pittsburgh recube action
neilkaz -- Tuesday, 24 February 2009, at 1:46 a.m.
- Pittsburgh recube action
David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 24 February 2009, at 5:03 a.m.
- Pittsburgh recube action
Neil Robins -- Tuesday, 24 February 2009, at 8:23 a.m.
- Pittsburgh recube action
Sam Pottle -- Tuesday, 24 February 2009, at 10:45 a.m.
- Pittsburgh recube action
Barry Silliman -- Thursday, 26 February 2009, at 1:47 a.m.
- Pittsburgh recube action
neilkaz -- Tuesday, 24 February 2009, at 1:19 p.m.
- Pittsburgh recube action
Rich Munitz -- Tuesday, 24 February 2009, at 3:30 p.m.
- Pittsburgh recube action Rollout
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Tuesday, 24 February 2009, at 11:05 p.m.
- Pittsburgh recube action
Coolrey -- Wednesday, 25 February 2009, at 12:19 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.