| |
BGonline.org Forums
MET and G%
Posted By: David Rockwell In Response To: MET and G% (neilkaz)
Date: Monday, 2 March 2009, at 6:14 p.m.
I agree with everything you said. No one is going to play well enough to get this gammon percentage against strong play. But, there just isn't a reasonable way to add a little bit of human error into the table construction. I'm going entirely with cumputer results. So again, I think your approach of shading the table a little bit is the best practical application. The primary advantage of this work will be to extend the table past 11 games, the point where G11 stopped. I've completed 7a1aP and 6a1aC with 5a2a running now and 4a3a up next.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.