BGonline.org Forums

Advanced Backgammon part 22C

Posted By: neilkaz
Date: Friday, 20 March 2009, at 2:52 p.m.

In Response To: Advanced Backgammon part 22C (Matt Cohn-Geier)

217 ..10/7 since I think splitting loses too many extra G's in return for doubtful chances to get more hits.

218 ..13/5 since I think running loses too many extra G's in return for doubtful chances to win more games.

219 .. OMFG why was this included in a book with "Advanced" in the title?

220 ..7/1 should win more G's. I am not sure what wins more games.

Messages In This Thread

• Advanced Backgammon part 22C
  Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 19 March 2009, at 4:12 a.m.
  • Advanced Backgammon part 22C
    Christian Munk-Christensen -- Thursday, 19 March 2009, at 12:47 p.m.
  • Advanced Backgammon part 22C
    Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 19 March 2009, at 7:05 p.m.
  • Robertie's picks
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Friday, 20 March 2009, at 2:41 a.m.
  • Advanced Backgammon part 22C
    neilkaz -- Friday, 20 March 2009, at 2:52 p.m.
  • Advanced Backgammon part 22C
    Keene -- Friday, 20 March 2009, at 6:52 p.m.
  • Advanced Backgammon part 22C
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Wednesday, 25 March 2009, at 10:49 p.m.
    • Advanced Backgammon part 22C
      Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 26 March 2009, at 1:59 p.m.
      • Advanced Backgammon part 22C
        Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 26 March 2009, at 4:40 p.m.
      • Advanced Backgammon part 22C
        Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 26 March 2009, at 4:41 p.m.