BGonline.org Forums

Advanced Backgammon part 22C

Posted By: Keene
Date: Friday, 20 March 2009, at 6:52 p.m.

In Response To: Advanced Backgammon part 22C (Matt Cohn-Geier)

217: 10/8,10/9. I think I may have seen this one before - you dont want to pay off to 16 after getting a game winning hit next shake. I could be wrong though...

218: 13/5. Is running from anchor really a consideration?

219: Two off. Whats the alternative?

220: bar/21*,13/7. I just want to lock in the prime right now.

Messages In This Thread

• Advanced Backgammon part 22C
  Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 19 March 2009, at 4:12 a.m.
  • Advanced Backgammon part 22C
    Christian Munk-Christensen -- Thursday, 19 March 2009, at 12:47 p.m.
  • Advanced Backgammon part 22C
    Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 19 March 2009, at 7:05 p.m.
  • Robertie's picks
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Friday, 20 March 2009, at 2:41 a.m.
  • Advanced Backgammon part 22C
    neilkaz -- Friday, 20 March 2009, at 2:52 p.m.
  • Advanced Backgammon part 22C
    Keene -- Friday, 20 March 2009, at 6:52 p.m.
  • Advanced Backgammon part 22C
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Wednesday, 25 March 2009, at 10:49 p.m.
    • Advanced Backgammon part 22C
      Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 26 March 2009, at 1:59 p.m.
      • Advanced Backgammon part 22C
        Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 26 March 2009, at 4:40 p.m.
      • Advanced Backgammon part 22C
        Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 26 March 2009, at 4:41 p.m.