[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Nack is right (IMHO)

Posted By: happyjuggler0
Date: Monday, 30 March 2009, at 1:57 a.m.

In Response To: Vegas Super Jackpot Entry Round (David Rockwell)

you are ignoring the ROI of 0% on the $1,000 not invested in an entry fee. Entering the round of 16 puts this money to work in a profitable venture too

That's my thinking too. This isn't a choice between entering a round of 32 twice vs entering a round of 16 once, it is a choice between entering the round of 32 once vs entering the round of 16 once.

Once you put it in those terms, and realize that the extra $1000 is going to be stuck in a bank account, or money market account, or your pocket, and earning essentially $0 for the weekend on that $1000, then your ROI on your $2000 is superior upon entering the round of 16, assuming you are a positive equity player to begin with, along with all the other assumptions I made in my original post in this thread.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.