| |
BGonline.org Forums
Rollout
Posted By: Stick In Response To: Rollout (Christian Munk-Christensen)
Date: Monday, 30 March 2009, at 12:01 p.m.
I already wasted 20k trials on things I know to be wrong, you want me to add other plays that are even worse? lol What about 24/23 13/11!?
It seems to be the best two is clearly to split the back checkers. You've already made the 5pt so that builder, 13/11, is semi wasted. It'd still be nice to have out there, don't get me wrong, but not as important as getting your back checkers moving when you're already behind a growing 3.5 prime. So any play not involving 24/22 I would immediate toss out the window.
As for 24/21, that's a bit too committal for my taste. Feels like putting all your eggs in one anchor up basket. I'm looking around for the best ace after I've played 24/22 and I don't think 22/21 is it. I stay off the point my opponent most wants to make, he'll be more hesitant to attack loosely on the 3pt than the 4pt and even if he does PoH on the 3pt he'll still have the gapped 4pt I may be able to anchor up on. I believe both plays I rolled out to be ahead of 24/21.
Perhaps I will add the other two candidate plays when I start in on my 3rd roll money rollouts again (shortly!) but I was doing this rollout as a 'side project' and don't want to waste any more time on it just now.
Stick
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.