BGonline.org Forums

A new variance reduction technique

Posted By: Walter Trice
Date: Tuesday, 31 March 2009, at 5:37 a.m.

In Response To: A new variance reduciton technique (Bob Koca)

Perhaps some more analytical work could produce a quantitative estimate of the benefits? It seems clear that the technique would produce an x% time savings for checker-play rollouts, but x=50 would be a lot more interesting than x=.001. A convincing argument that x = would greatly increase the chance that this idea will ever get a practical test.

Messages In This Thread

• A new variance reduciton technique
  Bob Koca -- Sunday, 29 March 2009, at 7:47 p.m.
  • A new variance reduciton technique
    David Rockwell -- Monday, 30 March 2009, at 4:08 a.m.
    • A new variance reduciton technique
      Bob Koca -- Monday, 30 March 2009, at 4:43 a.m.
    • A new variance reduciton technique
      Bob Koca -- Monday, 30 March 2009, at 4:51 a.m.
  • A new variance reduciton technique
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Monday, 30 March 2009, at 4:56 a.m.
    • A new variance reduciton technique
      Bob Koca -- Monday, 30 March 2009, at 5:34 a.m.
      • A new variance reduciton technique
        Stick -- Monday, 30 March 2009, at 5:38 a.m.
        • A new variance reduciton technique
          Matt Cohn-Geier -- Monday, 30 March 2009, at 5:42 a.m.
  • A new variance reduciton technique
    MaX -- Monday, 30 March 2009, at 2:13 p.m.
    • A new variance reduciton technique
      Bob Koca -- Monday, 30 March 2009, at 2:57 p.m.
      • A new variance reduciton technique
        Maik Stiebler -- Tuesday, 31 March 2009, at 10:21 a.m.
      • A new variance reduciton technique
        MaX -- Tuesday, 31 March 2009, at 11:15 a.m.
  • A new variance reduction technique
    Walter Trice -- Tuesday, 31 March 2009, at 5:37 a.m.
  • I tried it
    Tom Keith -- Wednesday, 1 April 2009, at 1:18 a.m.
    • I tried it
      Bob Koca -- Thursday, 2 April 2009, at 3:15 p.m.
      • I tried it
        Tom Keith -- Thursday, 2 April 2009, at 6:37 p.m.