BGonline.org Forums

Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #3

Posted By: neilkaz
Date: Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 6:33 p.m.

In Response To: Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #3 (Stick)

I would pass at and even score and also pass even here. Too gammonish, too many shots since Mary will drill you on the 2 ptwith missing 6's.

Messages In This Thread

• Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #3
  Stick -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 3:03 p.m.
  • Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #3
    Bill Riles -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 3:33 p.m.
  • Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #3
    pontiac -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 5:40 p.m.
  • Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #3
    neilkaz -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 6:33 p.m.
  • Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #3
    David -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 7:55 p.m.
  • Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #3
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 8:10 p.m.
  • Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #3
    Marv Porten -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 9:44 p.m.
  • Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #3
    Stein Kulseth -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 10:08 p.m.
  • Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #3
    misja -- Thursday, 9 April 2009, at 7:05 a.m.
  • Rollout
    Stick -- Thursday, 9 April 2009, at 3:54 p.m.