BGonline.org Forums
Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #2
Posted By: David
Date: Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 8:00 p.m.
In Response To: Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #2 (Stick)
For me this is just a BARE take, not an easy take at all.
In my eyes white has a big initiative along with his better structure & immediate threats.
Messages In This Thread
- Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #2
Stick -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 3:02 p.m.
- Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #2
Bill Riles -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 3:33 p.m.
- Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #2
pontiac -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 5:41 p.m.
- Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #2
neilkaz -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 6:34 p.m.
- Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #2
David -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 8:00 p.m.
- Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #2
Stein Kulseth -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 10:03 p.m.
- Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #2
misja -- Thursday, 9 April 2009, at 7:01 a.m.
- Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #2
Christian Munk-Christensen -- Thursday, 9 April 2009, at 9:25 a.m.
- Rollout
Stick -- Thursday, 9 April 2009, at 3:52 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.