BGonline.org Forums

Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #2

Posted By: David
Date: Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 8:00 p.m.

In Response To: Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #2 (Stick)

For me this is just a BARE take, not an easy take at all.

In my eyes white has a big initiative along with his better structure & immediate threats.

Messages In This Thread

• Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #2
  Stick -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 3:02 p.m.
  • Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #2
    Bill Riles -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 3:33 p.m.
  • Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #2
    pontiac -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 5:41 p.m.
  • Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #2
    neilkaz -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 6:34 p.m.
  • Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #2
    David -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 8:00 p.m.
  • Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #2
    Stein Kulseth -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 10:03 p.m.
  • Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #2
    misja -- Thursday, 9 April 2009, at 7:01 a.m.
  • Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #2
    Christian Munk-Christensen -- Thursday, 9 April 2009, at 9:25 a.m.
  • Rollout
    Stick -- Thursday, 9 April 2009, at 3:52 p.m.