BGonline.org Forums

Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #3

Posted By: misja
Date: Thursday, 9 April 2009, at 7:05 a.m.

In Response To: Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #3 (Stick)

First of all the drop seems very clear, so the question is whether it is TG.
I can see some sequences where Stick can take some kind of backgame next turn, but still it's no disaster for Mary if this happens. Otoh there are also sequences where white can get a crushing attack going. So I would play on.

Messages In This Thread

• Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #3
  Stick -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 3:03 p.m.
  • Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #3
    Bill Riles -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 3:33 p.m.
  • Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #3
    pontiac -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 5:40 p.m.
  • Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #3
    neilkaz -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 6:33 p.m.
  • Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #3
    David -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 7:55 p.m.
  • Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #3
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 8:10 p.m.
  • Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #3
    Marv Porten -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 9:44 p.m.
  • Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #3
    Stein Kulseth -- Wednesday, 8 April 2009, at 10:08 p.m.
  • Hickey v. Stickey (Cleveland) #3
    misja -- Thursday, 9 April 2009, at 7:05 a.m.
  • Rollout
    Stick -- Thursday, 9 April 2009, at 3:54 p.m.