BGonline.org Forums

Terminology for "super joker"

Posted By: mamabear
Date: Tuesday, 21 April 2009, at 9:20 p.m.

In Response To: Terminology for "super joker" (Jason Lee)

To get a "super"-lative designation, it really should be a single number or maybe two (e.g., "the 65 combination") that produces a huge equity swing compared to anything else that could have been rolled. The equity swing alone isn't enough...for instance, hitting with a five from the bar after he's forced to blot after a closeout may convert you from getting gammoned to being the game favorite, but with 11/36 numbers doing that, the one you actually rolled doesn't qualify to be called "super" anything. It's like the first grade class where at the end of the year, every kid gets an award for something. If too many rolls are special, none of them are >>

Messages In This Thread

• Terminology for "super joker"
  Jason Lee -- Tuesday, 21 April 2009, at 4:51 a.m.
  • Terminology for "super joker"
    mamabear -- Tuesday, 21 April 2009, at 9:20 p.m.
    • You mean something like this ?
      neilkaz -- Tuesday, 21 April 2009, at 9:37 p.m.
      • Exactly, and also Ouch *NM*
        mamabear -- Tuesday, 21 April 2009, at 10:04 p.m.