BGonline.org Forums

Riles v. Stick - 52

Posted By: pontiac
Date: Thursday, 30 April 2009, at 6:26 p.m.

In Response To: Riles v. Stick - 52 (Stick)

with two 24pt checkers 6-1* attack play looks not logical here, if there were advanced may play 6-1 but here prefer two down 13

Messages In This Thread

• Riles v. Stick - 52
  Stick -- Thursday, 30 April 2009, at 10:26 a.m.
  • Riles v. Stick - 52
    Havard Raddum -- Thursday, 30 April 2009, at 10:43 a.m.
  • Riles v. Stick - 52
    neilkaz -- Thursday, 30 April 2009, at 12:43 p.m.
    • Rephrasing
      neilkaz -- Thursday, 30 April 2009, at 5:58 p.m.
  • Riles v. Stick - 52
    Ian Shaw -- Thursday, 30 April 2009, at 12:45 p.m.
  • Riles v. Stick - 52
    Coolrey -- Thursday, 30 April 2009, at 5:01 p.m.
  • Riles v. Stick - 52
    pontiac -- Thursday, 30 April 2009, at 6:26 p.m.
  • Riles v. Stick - 52
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 30 April 2009, at 7:39 p.m.
  • Rollout
    Stick -- Friday, 1 May 2009, at 5:13 a.m.
    • Rollout
      Bill Riles -- Friday, 1 May 2009, at 12:52 p.m.
    • Rollout
      Gregg Cattanach -- Friday, 1 May 2009, at 1:34 p.m.
  • Riles v. Stick - 52
    garyo -- Friday, 1 May 2009, at 5:47 a.m.