[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Do you have a clue how to play this?

Posted By: rew
Date: Wednesday, 6 May 2009, at 1:52 p.m.

In Response To: Do you have a clue how to play this? (Matt Cohn-Geier)

So, in this position :

The score (after 0 games) is: player 0 0, player 1 0

Move number 7: player 1 on roll, cube decision?


' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '

5X2O7X2O2O4O3O2O ' ' ' '

Pip counts: player 0 349, player 1 83
Position ID: AADgz3dmezcAAA Match ID: cAkAAAAAAAAA

• player 1 doubles

Alert: wrong double ( -0,9284)!

Cube decision
2-ply cubeless equity +1,8887
0,9020 0,7165 0,3681 - 0,0980 0,0000 0,0000
Cubeful equities:
1.No double +1,9284
2.Double, take +3,7108 +1,7824
3.Double, pass +1,0000 -0,9284
Proper cube action:Too good to double, pass (34,2%)

Gnu thinks blacks equity is -3.7 after taking and snowie thinks 2.3 after taking. What do you approximately think this pos is worth?

Likewise, in this :

The score (after 0 games) is: player 0 0, player 1 0

Move number 3: player 1 on roll, cube decision?


3X3X ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '

4X3O5X5O4O3O ' ' ' ' ' '

Pip counts: player 0 215, player 1 64
Position ID: dwAA+DzO9w4AAA Match ID: cAkAAAAAAAAA

• player 1 doubles

Alert: wrong double ( -0,5349)!

Cube decision
2-ply cubeless equity +1,4657
0,8635 0,6293 0,1101 - 0,1365 0,0007 0,0000
Cubeful equities:
1.No double +1,5349
2.Double, take +2,8386 +1,3036
3.Double, pass +1,0000 -0,5349
Proper cube action:Too good to double, pass (29,1%)

Gnu thinks is wort -2.8 after taking and snowie thinks -2.9, what do you think?

Does the bots vastly underestimate the backgame in one or both of these positions? Are both positions 'equally bad'?

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.