BGonline.org Forums

62$ 63

Posted By: Bob Koca
Date: Sunday, 10 May 2009, at 1:38 a.m.

In Response To: 62$ 63 (David)

62$ is two pips better than 51$ but a little worse distribution. After 51$ running with 63 is correct by a small amount. The opponent's extra 2 pips argues a little against the running play. The possible prime is slightly less likely also. Got to be real close now. I'll try the slot.

Messages In This Thread

• 62$ 63
  David Rockwell -- Sunday, 10 May 2009, at 12:48 a.m.
  • 62$ 63
    David -- Sunday, 10 May 2009, at 1:03 a.m.
    • 62$ 63
      Bob Koca -- Sunday, 10 May 2009, at 1:38 a.m.
      • 62$ 63
        neilkaz -- Sunday, 10 May 2009, at 5:27 a.m.
  • 62$ 63
    Neil Robins -- Sunday, 10 May 2009, at 7:06 a.m.
  • 62$ 63
    Christian Munk-Christensen -- Sunday, 10 May 2009, at 9:09 a.m.
  • 62$ 63 - RO
    David Rockwell -- Sunday, 10 May 2009, at 11:37 p.m.