BGonline.org Forums

Now that Bill had caught up in the match, was it time for a positionally oriented cube?

Posted By: Ian Shaw
Date: Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 12:14 p.m.

In Response To: Now that Bill had caught up in the match, was it time for a positionally oriented cube? (neilkaz)

White has more than just a threee point game ("at worst almost a take") here. Blue has three back chequers to extricate. Sure, Blue might hit on the nine point, but if he doesn't, White may anchor there.

I don't think this is a double yet.

Messages In This Thread

• Now that Bill had caught up in the match, was it time for a positionally oriented cube?
  neilkaz -- Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 4:18 a.m.
  • Now that Bill had caught up in the match, was it time for a positionally oriented cube?
    Christian Munk-Christensen -- Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 8:04 a.m.
  • Now that Bill had caught up in the match, was it time for a positionally oriented cube?
    Ian Shaw -- Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 12:14 p.m.
  • Now that Bill had caught up in the match, was it time for a positionally oriented cube?
    Coolrey -- Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 4:55 p.m.
  • GNU 2-ply
    joe freedman -- Thursday, 28 May 2009, at 11:05 a.m.
  • OTB. long rollout ..etc
    neilkaz -- Thursday, 28 May 2009, at 4:56 p.m.
  • Now that Bill had caught up in the match, was it time for a positionally oriented cube?
    Jason Lee -- Thursday, 28 May 2009, at 5:08 p.m.