BGonline.org Forums

Early attacking cube

Posted By: MandM1951
Date: Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 12:29 p.m.

In Response To: Early attacking cube (neilkaz)

OTB, I'm sure I wouldn't cube. I'd look at my 3 checkers back and homeboard blot and think that, even with 1 of Blue's checkers on the bar, I'm only "threatening to threaten" and I'd roll. But with QF, White's pick and cover rolls became more salient to me. They are market losers. Perhaps it is correct to cube here? The take seems clear.

Messages In This Thread

• Early attacking cube
  neilkaz -- Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 4:26 a.m.
  • Early attacking cube
    Christian Munk-Christensen -- Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 8:06 a.m.
  • Early attacking cube
    Ian Shaw -- Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 10:38 a.m.
  • Early attacking cube
    MandM1951 -- Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 12:29 p.m.
  • Early attacking cube
    John O'Hagan -- Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 2:10 p.m.
  • Early attacking cube
    Stick -- Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 3:21 p.m.
    • Early attacking cube.,,thoughts OTB
      neilkaz -- Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 3:57 p.m.
    • Early attacking cube
      Matt Cohn-Geier -- Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 4:05 p.m.
  • Early attacking cube
    Keene -- Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 4:46 p.m.
  • Early attacking cube
    Coolrey -- Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 4:50 p.m.
  • 0-ply rollout
    neilkaz -- Thursday, 28 May 2009, at 4:49 p.m.
    • 0-ply rollout
      Jason Lee -- Thursday, 28 May 2009, at 5:13 p.m.
      • 0-ply rollout
        Gregg Cattanach -- Thursday, 28 May 2009, at 5:36 p.m.
      • 2-ply rollout
        neilkaz -- Thursday, 28 May 2009, at 9:19 p.m.
        • 2-ply rollout
          Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 28 May 2009, at 9:31 p.m.