BGonline.org Forums

Early attacking cube

Posted By: Coolrey
Date: Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 4:50 p.m.

In Response To: Early attacking cube (neilkaz)

This could be an exception, due to the score, but I have found that when considering this type of double the breakoff point between no double and double is the size of the board.

No double with 2 point board, Double with 3 point board.

With an extra White checker back, this looks like no double/take to me.

Messages In This Thread

• Early attacking cube
  neilkaz -- Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 4:26 a.m.
  • Early attacking cube
    Christian Munk-Christensen -- Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 8:06 a.m.
  • Early attacking cube
    Ian Shaw -- Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 10:38 a.m.
  • Early attacking cube
    MandM1951 -- Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 12:29 p.m.
  • Early attacking cube
    John O'Hagan -- Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 2:10 p.m.
  • Early attacking cube
    Stick -- Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 3:21 p.m.
    • Early attacking cube.,,thoughts OTB
      neilkaz -- Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 3:57 p.m.
    • Early attacking cube
      Matt Cohn-Geier -- Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 4:05 p.m.
  • Early attacking cube
    Keene -- Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 4:46 p.m.
  • Early attacking cube
    Coolrey -- Wednesday, 27 May 2009, at 4:50 p.m.
  • 0-ply rollout
    neilkaz -- Thursday, 28 May 2009, at 4:49 p.m.
    • 0-ply rollout
      Jason Lee -- Thursday, 28 May 2009, at 5:13 p.m.
      • 0-ply rollout
        Gregg Cattanach -- Thursday, 28 May 2009, at 5:36 p.m.
      • 2-ply rollout
        neilkaz -- Thursday, 28 May 2009, at 9:19 p.m.
        • 2-ply rollout
          Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 28 May 2009, at 9:31 p.m.