BGonline.org Forums

More than a MET

Posted By: Fabrice Liardet
Date: Wednesday, 24 June 2009, at 8:01 a.m.

In Response To: More than a MET (David Rockwell)

OK, thank you for that. I had thought about setting up a position that leaded to the start position, but I didn't know about the initial roll box. Did you mean "so that no doubles are rolled on the first shake" ?

If I understand variance reduction correctly, it manipulates the game value so that the big cubes don't account for too much in the result. That would indeed mean that getting the actual result distribution would require to turn off variance reduction. Does that mean that an accurate rollout would require ages to complete ?

Messages In This Thread

• More than a MET
  Fabrice Liardet -- Tuesday, 23 June 2009, at 2:55 p.m.
  • More than a MET
    Rich Munitz -- Tuesday, 23 June 2009, at 3:05 p.m.
    • More than a MET
      Fabrice Liardet -- Tuesday, 23 June 2009, at 3:15 p.m.
  • More than a MET
    Bob Koca -- Tuesday, 23 June 2009, at 4:51 p.m.
    • More than a MET
      Fabrice Liardet -- Tuesday, 23 June 2009, at 7:31 p.m.
  • More than a MET
    David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 23 June 2009, at 6:51 p.m.
    • More than a MET
      Fabrice Liardet -- Tuesday, 23 June 2009, at 7:46 p.m.
      • More than a MET
        Rich Munitz -- Tuesday, 23 June 2009, at 8:20 p.m.
        • More than a MET
          Fabrice Liardet -- Wednesday, 24 June 2009, at 8:06 a.m.
      • More than a MET
        David Rockwell -- Wednesday, 24 June 2009, at 3:40 a.m.
        • More than a MET
          Fabrice Liardet -- Wednesday, 24 June 2009, at 8:01 a.m.