BGonline.org Forums

SM v. NK - 65 (Chicago)

Posted By: neilkaz
Date: Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 2:22 p.m.

In Response To: SM v. NK - 65 (Chicago) (Stick)

OTB I felt that Stick should clear the 8 pt since hopping both leaves me 9 shots (he does have counterplay from the roof, but I may hit back after that as well) when he trails in the race.

I'd still clear the 8 pt. It isn't pretty, but I think it is a bit tactically superior to hopping out.

Messages In This Thread

• SM v. NK - 65 (Chicago)
  Stick -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 8:16 a.m.
  • SM v. NK - 65 (Chicago)
    Mislav Radica -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 8:39 a.m.
    • SM v. NK - 65 (Chicago)
      Sam Pottle -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 9:04 a.m.
  • SM v. NK - 65 (Chicago)
    Christian Munk-Christensen -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 9:02 a.m.
  • SM v. NK - 65 (Chicago)
    MaX -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 10:50 a.m.
  • SM v. NK - 65 (Chicago)
    garyo -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 12:10 p.m.
  • SM v. NK - 65 (Chicago)
    neilkaz -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 2:22 p.m.
  • SM v. NK - 65 (Chicago)
    Marty Storer -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 2:26 p.m.
  • SM v. NK - 65 (Chicago)
    Rich Munitz -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 3:13 p.m.
    • SM v. NK - 65 (Chicago)
      jdg -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 4:16 p.m.
  • SM v. NK - 65 (Chicago)
    Chuck Bower -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 4:25 p.m.
  • Rollout
    Stick -- Thursday, 2 July 2009, at 6:03 a.m.