BGonline.org Forums

SM v. NK - 65 (Chicago)

Posted By: jdg
Date: Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 4:16 p.m.

In Response To: SM v. NK - 65 (Chicago) (Rich Munitz)

*sigh* Still have a lot to learn:

* Didn't look at two out because of the race.

* Didn't like clearing the 8 as he's not going to forced to break next roll, and thus I'm going to be stripped.

* So... 13-2. If hit, still in the game.

Looks like I've found the 3rd best play yet again. :-)

jdg

Messages In This Thread

• SM v. NK - 65 (Chicago)
  Stick -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 8:16 a.m.
  • SM v. NK - 65 (Chicago)
    Mislav Radica -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 8:39 a.m.
    • SM v. NK - 65 (Chicago)
      Sam Pottle -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 9:04 a.m.
  • SM v. NK - 65 (Chicago)
    Christian Munk-Christensen -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 9:02 a.m.
  • SM v. NK - 65 (Chicago)
    MaX -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 10:50 a.m.
  • SM v. NK - 65 (Chicago)
    garyo -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 12:10 p.m.
  • SM v. NK - 65 (Chicago)
    neilkaz -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 2:22 p.m.
  • SM v. NK - 65 (Chicago)
    Marty Storer -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 2:26 p.m.
  • SM v. NK - 65 (Chicago)
    Rich Munitz -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 3:13 p.m.
    • SM v. NK - 65 (Chicago)
      jdg -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 4:16 p.m.
  • SM v. NK - 65 (Chicago)
    Chuck Bower -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 4:25 p.m.
  • Rollout
    Stick -- Thursday, 2 July 2009, at 6:03 a.m.