| |
BGonline.org Forums
Two things that need to be done with XBG
Posted By: Frank Berger In Response To: Two things that need to be done with XBG (Ian Dunstan)
Date: Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 9:38 p.m.
Where BGBlitz fits into the backgame debate I don't know, perhaps Frank can enlighten us, if he reads this.
Unfortunately not really. Doing BGB and BGB2go (the latter together with Markus Hervén) all in my sparetime is nearly like a full time job. I regret that I haven't analyzed weaknesses and strength more thoroughly, but as long as the feature list still has some important omissions I don't know when to do this (but I'm working on that).
My overall impression is that BGB evaluation is robust in the sense that it doesn't go astray on unusual positions, but impressions don't count. I strongly prefer measurement by benchmarks ;)
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.