[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Two things that need to be done with XBG

Posted By: Frank Berger
Date: Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 9:38 p.m.

In Response To: Two things that need to be done with XBG (Ian Dunstan)

Where BGBlitz fits into the backgame debate I don't know, perhaps Frank can enlighten us, if he reads this.

Unfortunately not really. Doing BGB and BGB2go (the latter together with Markus Hervén) all in my sparetime is nearly like a full time job. I regret that I haven't analyzed weaknesses and strength more thoroughly, but as long as the feature list still has some important omissions I don't know when to do this (but I'm working on that).

My overall impression is that BGB evaluation is robust in the sense that it doesn't go astray on unusual positions, but impressions don't count. I strongly prefer measurement by benchmarks ;)

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.