BGonline.org Forums

Misquote about the XG NN

Posted By: Mislav Radica
Date: Wednesday, 1 July 2009, at 11:59 a.m.

In Response To: Misquote about the XG NN (Sam Pottle)

I also read somewhere on GNUbg mailing list how XBG NN are derived from GNUbg NN. Anyway, we definitely need to try XGB and GNUbg with Depreli positions and all those books positions and opening for which we have extensive GNUbg rollouts with strong setting. Maybe summer and vacations is close so it is not right moment for such effords but September could be nice.

I will definitely try with some test regarding rollout speed soon (in July).

I want to compare GNUbg 2/2 ply rollouts on quad core CPU (with multithread support-four in this case) with 3ply XBG rollouts with variance reduction (but not 3ply red) which could run only on two cores. I will back here with results. During those 15 trials days I will done book or two with both bots for which we done GNUbg rollouts. Will post here before to avoid duplicated work.

Messages In This Thread

• Misquote about the XG NN
  Stick -- Wednesday, 1 July 2009, at 6:00 a.m.
  • Misquote about the XG NN
    Ian Dunstan -- Wednesday, 1 July 2009, at 7:20 a.m.
    • Misquote about the XG NN
      misja -- Wednesday, 1 July 2009, at 7:24 a.m.
      • Misquote about the XG NN
        Ian Dunstan -- Wednesday, 1 July 2009, at 7:27 a.m.
  • Misquote about the XG NN
    Sam Pottle -- Wednesday, 1 July 2009, at 10:14 a.m.
    • Misquote about the XG NN
      Ian Dunstan -- Wednesday, 1 July 2009, at 11:16 a.m.
    • Misquote about the XG NN
      Mislav Radica -- Wednesday, 1 July 2009, at 11:59 a.m.