BGonline.org Forums

a question of 3-aw 3-aw maniac

Posted By: aoleg1
Date: Wednesday, 1 July 2009, at 1:05 p.m.

In Response To: Here's the position (neilkaz)

What are evaluations of different bots at 3-aw 3aw? An what is correct decision?

This is GNU evaluations with Zadeh MET.

: gnubg 0, user 0 (to 3)

gnubg	51
user	168
Position ID: 2LYBCBvHewMAAA Match ID: MAFuAAAAAAAA

Cube decision
2-ply cubeless equity		+0,882	(Money: +0,624)
	0,577 0,434 0,036 - 0,423 0,000 0,000
Cubeful equities:
1.	No double	+0,765
2.	Double, pass	+1,000	+0,235
3.	Double, take	+0,714	-0,051
Proper cube action:		No double, take (17,9%)

Cube decision
3-ply cubeless equity		+1,009	(Money: +0,721)
	0,605 0,465 0,047 - 0,395 0,000 0,000
Cubeful equities:
1.	Double, take	+0,965
2.	Double, pass	+1,000	+0,035
3.	No double	+0,871	-0,094
Proper cube action:		Double, take

Cube decision
4-ply cubeless equity		+0,879	(Money: +0,617)
	0,573 0,431 0,040 - 0,427 0,000 0,000
Cubeful equities:
1.	No double	+0,729
2.	Double, pass	+1,000	+0,271
3.	Double, take	+0,669	-0,060
Proper cube action:		No double, take (18,1%)

Messages In This Thread

• Test your favorite bot's evaluation skills on this 32 backgame
  neilkaz -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 3:37 a.m.
  • Here's the position
    neilkaz -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 3:38 a.m.
    • Here's the position
      Rich Munitz -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 2:47 p.m.
    • Here's some evals
      neilkaz -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 2:47 p.m.
      • Here's some evals
        Rich Munitz -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 3:32 p.m.
        • Here's some evals
          neilkaz -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 3:41 p.m.
    • Here's the position
      jdg -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 4:09 p.m.
    • Here's the position
      Chuck Bower -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 4:16 p.m.
      • Here's the position
        Marty Storer -- Wednesday, 1 July 2009, at 3:01 p.m.
        • Here's the position
          Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 1 July 2009, at 3:56 p.m.
    • Here's the position
      Frank Berger -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 7:21 p.m.
      • About the only thing wrong with BGB is VERY pessimistic backgame evaluations.
        neilkaz -- Wednesday, 1 July 2009, at 2:47 a.m.
        • About the only thing wrong with BGB is VERY pessimistic backgame evaluations.
          Ian Dunstan -- Wednesday, 1 July 2009, at 5:51 a.m.
          • BOT development and backgame evals
            neilkaz -- Wednesday, 1 July 2009, at 4:44 p.m.
            • BOT development and backgame evals
              Frank Berger -- Wednesday, 1 July 2009, at 9:03 p.m.
            • BOT development and backgame evals
              eXtreme Gammon -- Thursday, 2 July 2009, at 2:06 a.m.
    • a question of 3-aw 3-aw maniac
      aoleg1 -- Wednesday, 1 July 2009, at 1:05 p.m.
      • Zadeh MET=garbage *NM*
        neilkaz -- Wednesday, 1 July 2009, at 4:35 p.m.
        • Zadeh MET=garbage
          MaX -- Thursday, 2 July 2009, at 7:28 a.m.
  • xG 3-ply ROLLOUT Hmmmmm - 32 backgame
    Robert-Jan Veldhuizen (Zorba) -- Monday, 6 July 2009, at 4:13 p.m.
    • xG 3-ply ROLLOUT Hmmmmm - 32 backgame
      eXtreme Gammon -- Friday, 10 July 2009, at 3:00 a.m.
      • xG 3-ply ROLLOUT Hmmmmm - 32 backgame
        Robert-Jan Veldhuizen (Zorba) -- Monday, 13 July 2009, at 6:04 p.m.