BGonline.org Forums

SM v. GNU 44

Posted By: MaX
Date: Thursday, 2 July 2009, at 2:49 p.m.

In Response To: SM v. GNU 44 (Stick)

b/21 6/2 13/5* Board strenght is not in favor of blue, but blu already has an anchor and white has blots in the outfield. The 25% of the cases where white dances, blue is in good shape.

Another way of looking at it: if we hit, the made 1pt and 2pt become assets. Not hitting may turn them into liabilities for the rest of the game (white can anchor on the 5pt and develop his play in the outfield).

That said, I wouldn't be surprised to be wrong by a mile :)

MaX.

Messages In This Thread

• SM v. GNU 44
  Stick -- Thursday, 2 July 2009, at 5:56 a.m.
  • SM v. GNU 44
    Bob Koca -- Thursday, 2 July 2009, at 6:07 a.m.
    • SM v. GNU 44
      Rich Munitz -- Thursday, 2 July 2009, at 9:54 a.m.
  • SM v. GNU 44
    Petter Bengtsson -- Thursday, 2 July 2009, at 10:36 a.m.
  • SM v. GNU 44
    Keene -- Thursday, 2 July 2009, at 2:06 p.m.
  • SM v. GNU 44
    MandM1951 -- Thursday, 2 July 2009, at 2:41 p.m.
  • SM v. GNU 44
    MaX -- Thursday, 2 July 2009, at 2:49 p.m.
  • SM v. GNU 44
    John O'Hagan -- Thursday, 2 July 2009, at 3:06 p.m.
  • SM v. GNU 44
    garyo -- Saturday, 4 July 2009, at 8:02 a.m.
  • 3/3 XG rollout
    Petter Bengtsson -- Saturday, 4 July 2009, at 10:11 a.m.