BGonline.org Forums

BGB 3 ply eval, too pessimistic again

Posted By: neilkaz
Date: Saturday, 4 July 2009, at 8:54 p.m.

In Response To: BGB 3 ply eval (Neil Robins)

BGB is too pessimistic when considering the backgame player's chances, but not as drastic as what I have posted from later stages of developed backgames (ie bearing off or just about to) where BGB is far off the mark.

Messages In This Thread

• A more complicated backgame position to test yourself and BOTs
  neilkaz -- Thursday, 2 July 2009, at 4:09 p.m.
  • A more complicated backgame position to test yourself and BOTs
    Dan Pelton -- Thursday, 2 July 2009, at 4:32 p.m.
  • A more complicated backgame position to test yourself and BOTs
    jdg -- Thursday, 2 July 2009, at 6:05 p.m.
  • A more complicated backgame position to test yourself and BOTs
    lenny -- Friday, 3 July 2009, at 12:52 a.m.
  • GNU rollout and eval
    neilkaz -- Friday, 3 July 2009, at 11:15 p.m.
    • Snowie eval
      rew -- Saturday, 4 July 2009, at 7:47 a.m.
    • BGB 3 ply eval
      Neil Robins -- Saturday, 4 July 2009, at 7:48 a.m.
      • BGB 3 ply eval, too pessimistic again
        neilkaz -- Saturday, 4 July 2009, at 8:54 p.m.
    • XBG eval
      nixo -- Saturday, 4 July 2009, at 12:31 p.m.
    • xG evals + rollouts + quirk
      Robert-Jan Veldhuizen (Zorba) -- Sunday, 5 July 2009, at 10:23 a.m.
      • overview + conclusion
        Robert-Jan Veldhuizen (Zorba) -- Sunday, 5 July 2009, at 11:27 a.m.