BGonline.org Forums

Backgame play decision

Posted By: Stick
Date: Monday, 6 July 2009, at 11:37 a.m.

In Response To: Backgame play decision (Ian Dunstan)

I do some crazy wasting of CPU power things too but holy snikies, what a waste of time. Any results you get will be meaningless not only because of the variance involved but also how the bot plays it out. If I were insane to roll something like this out I'd expand the move filter beyond the default world class setting for sure, likely to supremo, which would mean it would take even longer.

For what it's worth, I find 8/7 8/5 quite pleasing to the palate.

Stick

Messages In This Thread

• Backgame play decision
  Ian Dunstan -- Monday, 6 July 2009, at 11:07 a.m.
  • Backgame play decision
    Stick -- Monday, 6 July 2009, at 11:37 a.m.
    • Backgame play decision
      Chuck Bower -- Monday, 6 July 2009, at 9:44 p.m.
      • Backgame play decision
        Matt Cohn-Geier -- Monday, 6 July 2009, at 10:06 p.m.
        • Backgame play decision
          Chuck Bower -- Tuesday, 7 July 2009, at 1:17 p.m.
    • Backgame play decision
      Ian Dunstan -- Tuesday, 7 July 2009, at 6:46 a.m.
      • Backgame play decision
        Petter Bengtsson -- Tuesday, 7 July 2009, at 12:38 p.m.
  • Backgame play decision
    Stein Kulseth -- Monday, 6 July 2009, at 1:41 p.m.
  • Backgame play decision
    Rich Munitz -- Monday, 6 July 2009, at 2:54 p.m.
  • Backgame play decision
    neilkaz -- Tuesday, 7 July 2009, at 12:24 a.m.
  • Backgame play decision
    Christian Munk-Christensen -- Wednesday, 8 July 2009, at 7:55 p.m.