| |
BGonline.org Forums
Awkward Clock Situation
Posted By: Rich Munitz In Response To: Awkward Clock Situation (Gregg Cattanach)
Date: Monday, 6 July 2009, at 9:15 p.m.
"I am of the opinion that the measure of an appropriate time control is when a small percentage of players DO get in time trouble."
I agree.
Please define "time trouble" and define "small percentage".
I define "time trouble" as down below 5% of the originally allotted reserve time.
I define "small percentage" as <2% (ignoring UBK).
Any data to support the contention that ONLY a small percentage of players DO get in time trouble? Are there 50 clocked matches per ABT event? Because it seems there is at least 1 PUBLICIZED incident of time trouble per event. How many incidents are not publicized?
It is not just me saying that 2/12 may not be sufficient. There are plenty of others. I am just the one that seems to be speaking up on the topic because I am apparently more interested in getting clock settings that the vast majority of players can be comfortable with and embrace clock play WHICH IS THE GOAL, than beating my chest and saying 2 minutes is enough and tough shit if 30% of the playing population does not like it; let them adapt or quit.
I have no problem with creating speed backgammon events and I'd happily enter one at 0.5/10 or so and play under those conditions. I think that would be a lot of fun actually. But ABT main and masters events should not be that.
If a tournament incurs a delay because of a 3.5 hour 700 move match, well so be it. The extra 6.5 minutes of time that would be added to the clock under a 2.5 TC is not going to radically change that. The goal is to eliminate the ridiculous 4 hour 300 move matches, where people play with no discipline whatsoever and clocks with any reasonable TC will accomplish that.
Hey Bill Davis - how about a poll on chicagopoint.com as to how people feel about whether 2/12 is a sufficient time control? Lets see what the silent masses think?
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.