BGonline.org Forums

Stay back with one or two checkers

Posted By: Rich Munitz
Date: Friday, 10 July 2009, at 1:23 a.m.

In Response To: Stay back with one or two checkers (neilkaz)

Looking at the rolls, it seems that the numbers that do damage to the blot if you run are good anyway, and there are no extra shots gained immediately and few likely later by staying. In fact 33 forces a shot by running.

I see no value keeping the point to offset the gammon losses.

I run.

Messages In This Thread

• Stay back with one or two checkers
  neilkaz -- Friday, 10 July 2009, at 12:50 a.m.
  • Stay back with one or two checkers
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Friday, 10 July 2009, at 12:56 a.m.
  • Stay back with one or two checkers
    Rich Munitz -- Friday, 10 July 2009, at 1:23 a.m.
  • Stay back with one or two checkers
    garyo -- Friday, 10 July 2009, at 1:29 a.m.
  • Stay back with one or two checkers
    Bill Riles -- Friday, 10 July 2009, at 2:34 a.m.
  • Stay back with one or two checkers
    Seth -- Friday, 10 July 2009, at 2:56 p.m.
  • Rollout and OTB
    neilkaz -- Friday, 10 July 2009, at 3:14 p.m.
  • $-game RO in progress *NM*
    Chuck Bower -- Friday, 10 July 2009, at 5:15 p.m.
    • $-game RO sez...
      Chuck Bower -- Friday, 10 July 2009, at 7:49 p.m.