BGonline.org Forums

You mean XG Roller setting? Couldn't it be made a bit stronger..ie it is so fast

Posted By: Mislav Radica
Date: Friday, 10 July 2009, at 10:02 a.m.

In Response To: You mean XG Roller setting? Couldn't it be made a bit stronger..ie it is so fast (neilkaz)

I think we should accept XG Roller as a default bot settings for XBG. In fact, it is 6ply truncated rollout but bcuz of it's speed (asembler code) it can be done in same time as GnuBG 2ply.This is one of the strongest XBG side. All weaker setting miss to benefit from XBG speed and they are almost meaningless for serious use (like GnuBG 0ply or 1ply).

Not sure but XG Roller could be the strongest bot in this moment. I will definitely start to compare it with GnuBG 2ply on book positions rollout next week.

For rollouts, I think GnuBG 2/2ply rollouts on Quad core processor is very comparable with XBG 3/3ply (not red). Didn't done tests yet but I will definitely.

My premise is that if one don't need rollouts for his game than XG Roller is fine but if one had Quadcore PC than GnuBg is still quite good at least. I hope I will prove this in next few weeks.

Messages In This Thread

• A Study From Mike Corbett's Book
  phil Simborg -- Thursday, 9 July 2009, at 11:24 a.m.
  • You men XG Roller setting? *NM*
    Mislav Radica -- Thursday, 9 July 2009, at 3:56 p.m.
    • Sorry, did you mean XG Roller setting? *NM*
      Mislav Radica -- Thursday, 9 July 2009, at 3:57 p.m.
    • You men XG Roller setting?
      phil Simborg -- Thursday, 9 July 2009, at 11:46 p.m.
      • You mean XG Roller setting? Couldn't it be made a bit stronger..ie it is so fast
        neilkaz -- Friday, 10 July 2009, at 12:47 a.m.
        • You mean XG Roller setting? Couldn't it be made a bit stronger..ie it is so fast
          Mislav Radica -- Friday, 10 July 2009, at 10:02 a.m.
          • You mean XG Roller setting? Couldn't it be made a bit stronger..ie it is so fast
            Gregg Cattanach -- Friday, 10 July 2009, at 8:03 p.m.
            • You mean XG Roller setting? Couldn't it be made a bit stronger..ie it is so fast
              Matt Reklaitis -- Friday, 10 July 2009, at 8:19 p.m.
            • You mean XG Roller setting? Couldn't it be made a bit stronger..ie it is so fast
              Ian Shaw -- Friday, 10 July 2009, at 10:46 p.m.
              • You mean XG Roller setting? Couldn't it be made a bit stronger..ie it is so fast
                Petter Bengtsson -- Friday, 10 July 2009, at 11:51 p.m.
                • You mean XG Roller setting? Couldn't it be made a bit stronger..ie it is so fast
                  Ian Shaw -- Saturday, 11 July 2009, at 5:24 p.m.
                  • You mean XG Roller setting? Couldn't it be made a bit stronger..ie it is so fast
                    Mislav Radica -- Sunday, 12 July 2009, at 9:09 p.m.
                    • You mean XG Roller setting? Couldn't it be made a bit stronger..ie it is so fast
                      Mislav Radica -- Sunday, 12 July 2009, at 9:19 p.m.
            • You mean XG Roller setting? Couldn't it be made a bit stronger..ie it is so fast
              phil Simborg -- Sunday, 12 July 2009, at 6:09 a.m.
              • You mean XG Roller setting? Couldn't it be made a bit stronger..ie it is so fast
                Neil Robins -- Sunday, 12 July 2009, at 6:45 a.m.
                • truncated@6 won't be a heck of a lot better...
                  Robert-Jan Veldhuizen (Zorba) -- Sunday, 12 July 2009, at 10:50 p.m.
        • Is it possible to make some kind of custom settings for XG Roller?
          Mislav Radica -- Friday, 10 July 2009, at 10:07 a.m.
          • Is it possible to make some kind of custom settings for XG Roller?
            phil Simborg -- Friday, 10 July 2009, at 1:07 p.m.
        • You mean XG Roller setting? Couldn't it be made a bit stronger..ie it is so fast
          phil Simborg -- Friday, 10 July 2009, at 1:05 p.m.