BGonline.org Forums

DMP: Defending against the 0-2 backgame

Posted By: garyo
Date: Monday, 13 July 2009, at 6:16 a.m.

In Response To: DMP: Defending against the 0-2 backgame (Rich Munitz)

our back checkers are just a little to far back to clear the 6 point. i'd lift a blot 11/6, then 18/15 looks like the best 2. if hit, we have to rely that 5 checkers behind a 5 prime will best 1 behind a 5 prime. even if we remake the 6 point and bring all our checkers around (white dancing) his containment rates to still be in place. so, let him enter on the 1 point.

Messages In This Thread

• DMP: Defending against the 0-2 backgame
  Rich Munitz -- Monday, 13 July 2009, at 5:19 a.m.
  • DMP: Defending against the 0-2 backgame
    Keene -- Monday, 13 July 2009, at 5:29 a.m.
    • DMP: Defending against the 0-2 backgame
      Bill Riles -- Monday, 13 July 2009, at 1:46 p.m.
  • DMP: Defending against the 0-2 backgame
    garyo -- Monday, 13 July 2009, at 6:16 a.m.
    • DMP: Defending against the 0-2 backgame
      John O'Hagan -- Monday, 13 July 2009, at 1:41 p.m.
  • DMP: Defending against the 0-2 backgame
    Christian Munk-Christensen -- Monday, 13 July 2009, at 3:26 p.m.
  • DMP: Defending against the 0-2 backgame
    Petter Bengtsson -- Monday, 13 July 2009, at 9:06 p.m.
  • DMP: Defending against the 0-2 backgame
    Chuck Bower -- Tuesday, 14 July 2009, at 5:03 p.m.
    • DMP: Defending against the 0-2 backgame
      Petter Bengtsson -- Tuesday, 14 July 2009, at 6:12 p.m.