BGonline.org Forums

Statistical significance

Posted By: Coolrey
Date: Monday, 3 August 2009, at 4:43 p.m.

In Response To: Statistical significance (David Startin)

So using your manufactured numbers:

RF 3.7 + 4.8 = 8.5 (avg 4.25) DS 2.7 + 9.0 = 11.7 (avg 5.85)

Using mine and the ones you stated yesterday

RF 3.5 + 2.97 = 6.47 (avg 3.25) DS 9.2 + 2.94 = 12.14 (avg 6.07)

Which ones make you feel better?

Which ones prove your point?

What is your conclusion? Does it match what you boasted/posted?

I rest my case.

Messages In This Thread

• Ray Fogerlund Completely Out-Played Me
  David Startin -- Sunday, 2 August 2009, at 11:49 p.m.
  • Ray Fogerlund Completely Out-Played Me
    Stick -- Monday, 3 August 2009, at 2:04 a.m.
    • Ray Fogerlund Completely Out-Played Me
      David Startin -- Monday, 3 August 2009, at 2:14 a.m.
      • Statistical significance
        Coolrey -- Monday, 3 August 2009, at 3:42 p.m.
        • Statistical significance
          David Startin -- Monday, 3 August 2009, at 3:50 p.m.
          • No significance, statistical or otherwise
            Rod -- Monday, 3 August 2009, at 4:09 p.m.
          • Statistical significance
            Coolrey -- Monday, 3 August 2009, at 4:43 p.m.
            • Statistical significance
              David Startin -- Tuesday, 4 August 2009, at 10:40 a.m.
              • Statistical significance
                playBunny -- Tuesday, 4 August 2009, at 11:29 a.m.
                • Statistical significance
                  David Startin -- Tuesday, 4 August 2009, at 11:50 a.m.
                  • Statistical significance
                    David Startin -- Tuesday, 4 August 2009, at 11:51 a.m.
                    • Statistical significance
                      playBunny -- Tuesday, 4 August 2009, at 12:29 p.m.
                  • Statistical significance
                    Rich Munitz -- Tuesday, 4 August 2009, at 1:36 p.m.
              • Statistical significance
                Frank_N_Stein -- Tuesday, 4 August 2009, at 5:25 p.m.