BGonline.org Forums

caution

Posted By: David Rockwell
Date: Wednesday, 5 August 2009, at 2:29 a.m.

In Response To: 41$ 11 ..first look with GNU 3 ply play rollout (neilkaz)

I was working on exactly this question a few weeks ago (41$-11 GNU vs Snowie). I put it aside without resolution. GNU & Snowie are reasonably close in their cubeless analysis. But, Snowie gives similar cube value to both plays in its live cube rollouts. GNU gives considerably more cube value to 11N {8-7(2), 6-5(2)} than it does to H {24-20*} in its live cube rollouts. Almost the entire difference in the rollout results is from this difference in the value given to the cube. Getting the cubeless number more precise will still leave us with the question of which live cube analysis is more accurate.

Messages In This Thread

• 41$ 11 ..first look with GNU 3 ply play rollout
  neilkaz -- Tuesday, 4 August 2009, at 4:54 p.m.
  • 41$ 11 at 2 ply gammon save...
    KenB -- Tuesday, 4 August 2009, at 9:14 p.m.
    • 41$ 11 at 2 ply gammon save...
      neilkaz -- Tuesday, 4 August 2009, at 9:58 p.m.
  • caution
    David Rockwell -- Wednesday, 5 August 2009, at 2:29 a.m.
    • caution
      neilkaz -- Wednesday, 5 August 2009, at 4:49 a.m.
  • 41$ 11 ..2nd look with GNU 3 ply play rollout
    neilkaz -- Thursday, 6 August 2009, at 2:16 p.m.
    • 41$ 11 ..2.7 jsd now
      neilkaz -- Friday, 7 August 2009, at 4:01 p.m.