BGonline.org Forums

Containing two checkers

Posted By: Matt Cohn-Geier
Date: Sunday, 9 August 2009, at 5:23 p.m.

In Response To: Containing two checkers (Timothy Chow)

2-ply has it as a .141 blunder to cube. 3-ply reduces it to only a .057 error. My guess is a rollout would be closer to 3-ply. But in practical terms it is probably significantly worse than that since your opponent won't handle the checkers as well as GNU.

Messages In This Thread

• Containing two checkers
  Timothy Chow -- Saturday, 8 August 2009, at 6:30 p.m.
  • Containing two checkers
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Sunday, 9 August 2009, at 3:41 a.m.
    • Containing two checkers
      Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 9 August 2009, at 5:18 p.m.
      • Containing two checkers
        Matt Cohn-Geier -- Sunday, 9 August 2009, at 5:23 p.m.
        • Containing two checkers
          Timothy Chow -- Monday, 10 August 2009, at 4:07 a.m.
          • Containing two checkers
            Chuck Bower -- Monday, 10 August 2009, at 2:10 p.m.