BGonline.org Forums

quacks

Posted By: Matt Cohn-Geier
Date: Wednesday, 12 August 2009, at 7:02 p.m.

In Response To: quacks (Chuck Bower)

I thought it was well known that the 5 & 4 were much better places for spare checkers than the 6. That's a relatively non-QF general principle that should give you a red flag that 8/6(4) isn't right.

Of course you can't get any checkers to the 5 point but you can maintain flex. Anyway, 8/4(2) for me. Though I am probably too good to be considered human.

Messages In This Thread

• quacks
  Petter Bengtsson -- Tuesday, 11 August 2009, at 5:31 p.m.
  • quacks
    Neil Robins -- Tuesday, 11 August 2009, at 6:54 p.m.
    • quacks
      neilkaz -- Tuesday, 11 August 2009, at 7:13 p.m.
    • quacks
      Rich Munitz -- Tuesday, 11 August 2009, at 8:27 p.m.
  • quacks
    Chuck Bower -- Tuesday, 11 August 2009, at 9:10 p.m.
    • quacks
      Keene -- Tuesday, 11 August 2009, at 10:01 p.m.
    • quacks
      Matt Cohn-Geier -- Wednesday, 12 August 2009, at 7:02 p.m.
  • quacks
    MaX -- Wednesday, 12 August 2009, at 11:58 a.m.
  • ROLLOUT
    Petter Bengtsson -- Thursday, 13 August 2009, at 2:44 p.m.
    • ROLLOUT
      Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 13 August 2009, at 4:20 p.m.