BGonline.org Forums

Hmm..

Posted By: neilkaz
Date: Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 6:26 p.m.

In Response To: Nackgammon MET (neilkaz)

quicky 0-ply rollout doesn't seem to show more G's in Nack, but then again, I'd not trust 0-ply for Nack.

Messages In This Thread

• Post-Crawford cube
  Petter Bengtsson -- Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 3:43 p.m.
  • Post-Crawford cube
    Bob Koca -- Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 4:08 p.m.
    • Post-Crawford cube
      Petter Bengtsson -- Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 4:45 p.m.
      • Post-Crawford cube
        Bob Koca -- Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 6:44 p.m.
        • Post-Crawford cube
          Matt Cohn-Geier -- Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 7:17 p.m.
  • Post-Crawford cube
    Bob Koca -- Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 4:10 p.m.
    • Nackgammon MET
      Petter Bengtsson -- Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 4:49 p.m.
      • Nackgammon MET
        neilkaz -- Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 5:19 p.m.
        • Hmm..
          neilkaz -- Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 6:26 p.m.
          • Hmm..
            Stick -- Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 7:21 p.m.
            • Hmm..
              neilkaz -- Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 7:23 p.m.
        • Nackgammon MET
          Fabrice Liardet -- Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 7:37 p.m.