BGonline.org Forums

Nackgammon MET

Posted By: Fabrice Liardet
Date: Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 7:37 p.m.

In Response To: Nackgammon MET (neilkaz)

I play Nack on a regular basis and I have always assumed that there were less gammons (because of less attackers and more mutual holding games). Now I realize that I just don't know whether that is true, and that would indeed be a valuable info.

Messages In This Thread

• Post-Crawford cube
  Petter Bengtsson -- Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 3:43 p.m.
  • Post-Crawford cube
    Bob Koca -- Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 4:08 p.m.
    • Post-Crawford cube
      Petter Bengtsson -- Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 4:45 p.m.
      • Post-Crawford cube
        Bob Koca -- Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 6:44 p.m.
        • Post-Crawford cube
          Matt Cohn-Geier -- Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 7:17 p.m.
  • Post-Crawford cube
    Bob Koca -- Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 4:10 p.m.
    • Nackgammon MET
      Petter Bengtsson -- Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 4:49 p.m.
      • Nackgammon MET
        neilkaz -- Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 5:19 p.m.
        • Hmm..
          neilkaz -- Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 6:26 p.m.
          • Hmm..
            Stick -- Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 7:21 p.m.
            • Hmm..
              neilkaz -- Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 7:23 p.m.
        • Nackgammon MET
          Fabrice Liardet -- Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 7:37 p.m.