BGonline.org Forums

Extremegammon Question on deeper Analysis

Posted By: Neil Robins
Date: Thursday, 10 September 2009, at 4:33 a.m.

In Response To: Extremegammon Question on deeper Analysis (Neil Robins)

If you want to compare your play to XG 3-ply. It would double and you would not. Your error is 0.106, according to the rollout compared to what XG would do - simple. Take or pass doesn't come into it, no such decision arose in the match. You could conceivably say that because XG makes a 0.052 error in its 3-ply analysis relating to the take that your error compared to XG 3-ply was 0.106 - 0.052 = 0.054. I don't think that would make much sense, but it would make a lot more sense than saying your error compared to it is 0.106 + 0.052 = 0.158.

Messages In This Thread

• Extremegammon Question on deeper Analysis
  Christian Plenz -- Wednesday, 9 September 2009, at 11:14 a.m.
  • better display hopefully
    Christian Plenz -- Wednesday, 9 September 2009, at 11:18 a.m.
  • Extremegammon Question on deeper Analysis
    Christian Plenz -- Wednesday, 9 September 2009, at 11:41 a.m.
    • Extremegammon Question on deeper Analysis
      eXtreme Gammon -- Thursday, 10 September 2009, at 1:55 a.m.
  • Extremegammon Question on deeper Analysis
    Neil Robins -- Wednesday, 9 September 2009, at 9:54 p.m.
  • Extremegammon Question on deeper Analysis
    Neil Robins -- Thursday, 10 September 2009, at 3:43 a.m.
    • Extremegammon Question on deeper Analysis
      Phil Simborg -- Thursday, 10 September 2009, at 4:06 a.m.
    • Extremegammon Question on deeper Analysis
      Neil Robins -- Thursday, 10 September 2009, at 4:33 a.m.
      • Extremegammon Question on deeper Analysis
        Phil Simborg -- Thursday, 10 September 2009, at 6:02 a.m.
    • You are right
      eXtreme Gammon -- Thursday, 10 September 2009, at 2:02 p.m.