| |
BGonline.org Forums
Any reason to roll out multiple-of-36 games?
Posted By: Maik Stiebler In Response To: Any reason to roll out multiple-of-36 games? (Timothy Chow)
Date: Wednesday, 30 September 2009, at 11:25 a.m.
"On the one hand, the non-doubles matter more so it might seem we should sample them proportionately heavily. However, perhaps the volatility is so large that I had better make sure I take at least one sample of each of the 6x6 possible pairs of rolls. I don't think we can say for sure which way is better."
Agreed. I'd put it this way: Multiples of 36 are better than multiples of 21 in general, but multiples of higher powers of 21 may be better than multiples of lower powers of 36.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.