BGonline.org Forums
4-Away, 4-Away - Backgame plan too risky at this score?
Posted By: Stick
Date: Monday, 12 October 2009, at 4:17 p.m.
In Response To: 4-Away, 4-Away - Backgame plan too risky at this score? (Max Urban)
An ever better question might be would that play, the crazy hit and leave the triple shot fall into the backgame play, be correct for money? Here I agree it's too much.
Stick
Messages In This Thread
- 4-Away, 4-Away - Backgame plan too risky at this score?
Max Urban -- Monday, 12 October 2009, at 9:55 a.m.
- 4-Away, 4-Away - Backgame plan too risky at this score?
Daniel Murphy -- Monday, 12 October 2009, at 4:15 p.m.
- 4-Away, 4-Away - Backgame plan too risky at this score?
Stick -- Monday, 12 October 2009, at 4:17 p.m.
- 4-Away, 4-Away - Backgame plan too risky at this score?
Martin -- Monday, 12 October 2009, at 6:01 p.m.
- 4-Away, 4-Away - Backgame plan too risky at this score?
Rich Munitz -- Monday, 12 October 2009, at 6:37 p.m.
- 4-Away, 4-Away - Backgame plan too risky at this score?
neilkaz -- Monday, 12 October 2009, at 7:35 p.m.
- 4-Away, 4-Away - RO at GG
Daniel Murphy -- Wednesday, 14 October 2009, at 2:14 p.m.
- 4-Away, 4-Away - RO money game
Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 15 October 2009, at 3:02 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.