| |
BGonline.org Forums
Re: Poker for the kids
Posted By: Stick In Response To: Re: Poker for the kids (Daniel Murphy)
Date: Wednesday, 9 May 2007, at 11:20 p.m.
The difference in those two hands is that "Son in Law" actually played his hands good. I don't follow any of the new 'poker phenoms' as I don't care. You have to laugh at it though when ppl compare him to Doyle ... the sheer mass of hands you've played doesn't make you a Brunson [even a Todd!]. The fact that you're decent and have played that many hands still doesn't entitle you to carry Doyle's dirty laundry.
I have the Bluff w/the article on him (them) in it...forget what it says though, maybe I'll dig it up.
Stick
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.