BGonline.org Forums

Correction: I meant "higher ER opponent" in first paragraph *NM*

Posted By: Marv Porten
Date: Thursday, 15 October 2009, at 6:10 p.m.

In Response To: Error rate calculated how means what, exactly? (Marv Porten)

Messages In This Thread

• Error rate calculated how means what, exactly?
  Daniel Murphy -- Wednesday, 14 October 2009, at 6:36 p.m.
  • Error rate calculated how means what, exactly?
    Gregg Cattanach -- Wednesday, 14 October 2009, at 7:38 p.m.
    • Error rate calculated how means what, exactly?
      Daniel Murphy -- Wednesday, 14 October 2009, at 7:53 p.m.
      • Error rate calculated how means what, exactly?
        Gregg Cattanach -- Wednesday, 14 October 2009, at 8:12 p.m.
        • Error rate calculated how means what, exactly?
          Daniel Murphy -- Wednesday, 14 October 2009, at 9:08 p.m.
      • Error rate calculated how means what, exactly?
        Phil Simborg -- Wednesday, 14 October 2009, at 9:21 p.m.
        • Error rate calculated how means what, exactly?
          Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 15 October 2009, at 12:21 a.m.
          • Error rate calculated how means what, exactly?
            Marv Porten -- Thursday, 15 October 2009, at 4:58 a.m.
            • Error rate calculated how means what, exactly?
              Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 15 October 2009, at 4:45 p.m.
              • Error rate calculated how means what, exactly?
                Marv Porten -- Thursday, 15 October 2009, at 6:01 p.m.
                • Correction: I meant "higher ER opponent" in first paragraph *NM*
                  Marv Porten -- Thursday, 15 October 2009, at 6:10 p.m.
                  • Correction: I meant "higher ER opponent" in first paragraph
                    Marv Porten -- Thursday, 15 October 2009, at 11:44 p.m.
                    • Correction: I meant "higher ER opponent" in first paragraph
                      Jason Lee -- Friday, 16 October 2009, at 2:11 a.m.
                    • Correction: I meant "higher ER opponent" in first paragraph
                      Matt Cohn-Geier -- Friday, 16 October 2009, at 4:58 a.m.
                      • Correction: I meant "higher ER opponent" in first paragraph
                        Keene -- Friday, 16 October 2009, at 6:20 a.m.
                      • Correction: I meant "higher ER opponent" in first paragraph
                        Maik Stiebler -- Friday, 16 October 2009, at 12:45 p.m.
                      • Correction: I meant "higher ER opponent" in first paragraph
                        Rich Munitz -- Friday, 16 October 2009, at 12:57 p.m.
                        • Correction: I meant "higher ER opponent" in first paragraph
                          Matt Cohn-Geier -- Friday, 16 October 2009, at 5:08 p.m.
                • Error rate calculated how means what, exactly?
                  Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 15 October 2009, at 7:49 p.m.
          • Error rate calculated how means what, exactly?
            Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 15 October 2009, at 7:43 a.m.
  • Error rate calculated how means what, exactly?
    Stick -- Wednesday, 14 October 2009, at 10:20 p.m.
    • Error rate calculated how means what, exactly?
      Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 15 October 2009, at 12:01 a.m.
      • Error rate calculated how means what, exactly?
        Gregg Cattanach -- Thursday, 15 October 2009, at 12:39 p.m.
  • Error rate calculated how means what, exactly?
    Christian Munk-Christensen -- Thursday, 15 October 2009, at 6:49 a.m.
    • Error rate calculated how means what, exactly?
      Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 15 October 2009, at 7:32 a.m.
      • Error rate calculated how means what, exactly?
        Christian Munk-Christensen -- Thursday, 15 October 2009, at 8:16 a.m.
        • Error rate calculated how means what, exactly?
          Stick -- Thursday, 15 October 2009, at 8:37 a.m.
          • Error rate calculated how means what, exactly?
            Christian Munk-Christensen -- Thursday, 15 October 2009, at 9:06 a.m.