| |
BGonline.org Forums
Correction: I meant "higher ER opponent" in first paragraph
Posted By: Matt Cohn-Geier In Response To: Correction: I meant "higher ER opponent" in first paragraph (Rich Munitz)
Date: Friday, 16 October 2009, at 5:08 p.m.
That was my point, the 5 ER player is a known dropper, but the 3 ER player doubles late anyway.
Or the 5 ER player is a known taker but the 3ER player doubles early. Or the 3ER player doesn't cube at odd-away Post-Crawford. Etc.
Here's a couple others:
1) Say A plays a 7 ER, B plays a 9 ER. A is a 65-35 favorite over B.
2) A plays a 3 ER, B plays a 3 ER. A is a 55-45 favorite over B.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.