BGonline.org Forums
Maybe there's a better way to measure takes?
Posted By: MaX
Date: Thursday, 22 October 2009, at 12:31 p.m.
In Response To: Maybe there's a better way to measure takes? (Ian Shaw)
I can still see this feature in the lastest code/distrib.
I'm not sure the reported numbers are 100% accurate since it's not one of the most used features (and the rollout code has been touched a few times in the past).
MaX.
Messages In This Thread
- Maybe there's a better way to measure takes?
Phil Simborg -- Sunday, 18 October 2009, at 1:58 a.m.
- Maybe there's a better way to measure takes?
Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 18 October 2009, at 3:15 a.m.
- Maybe there's a better way to measure takes?
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Sunday, 18 October 2009, at 3:36 a.m.
- Maybe there's a better way to measure takes?
Andreas -- Sunday, 18 October 2009, at 8:36 a.m.
- Maybe there's a better way to measure takes?
Fabrice Liardet -- Sunday, 18 October 2009, at 9:40 a.m.
- Maybe there's a better way to measure takes?
Stick -- Sunday, 18 October 2009, at 1:15 p.m.
- Maybe there's a better way to measure takes?
Fabrice Liardet -- Sunday, 18 October 2009, at 1:37 p.m.
- Maybe there's a better way to measure takes?
Ian Shaw -- Sunday, 18 October 2009, at 4:12 p.m.
- Maybe there's a better way to measure takes?
MaX -- Thursday, 22 October 2009, at 12:31 p.m.
- Maybe there's a better way to measure takes?
NJ -- Sunday, 18 October 2009, at 5:14 p.m.
- Maybe there's a better way to measure takes?
Keene -- Monday, 19 October 2009, at 4:33 p.m.
- Maybe there's a better way to measure takes?
Daniel Murphy -- Monday, 19 October 2009, at 6:14 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.