BGonline.org Forums

Blunder 1

Posted By: misja
Date: Thursday, 29 October 2009, at 11:06 a.m.

In Response To: Blunder 1 (Tad Bright)

21/16(2) for sure because we lead in the race and our position becomes disjointed otherwise.
Then with the other fives I don't like 6/1(2) because it overstretches our position.
13/8(2) looks better but might give difficulties to clear our 16 point later on.
16/11(2) leaves a compact position and looks best.

Messages In This Thread

• Blunder 1
  Tad Bright -- Thursday, 29 October 2009, at 6:38 a.m.
  • Blunder 1
    Havard Raddum -- Thursday, 29 October 2009, at 7:05 a.m.
  • Blunder 1
    Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 29 October 2009, at 8:32 a.m.
  • Blunder 1
    misja -- Thursday, 29 October 2009, at 11:06 a.m.
  • Blunder 1
    Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 29 October 2009, at 4:13 p.m.