BGonline.org Forums

Backgame theory BOT DATA

Posted By: Michael Depreli
Date: Friday, 30 October 2009, at 4:47 p.m.

In Response To: Backgame theory BOT DATA (Christian Munk-Christensen)

I'm getting more and more tempted to buy XG.

I have no financial interest in XG but for serious students of the game I'd say XG is easily worth $50 simply for it's speed and strength alone. It appears to have gained a significant edge over the other bots (at 3-ply)
I also like the XG Roller setting as it will find plays that other bots/plies will miss. If you're aiming to get an edge and be World Class, I believe owning only one bot isn't enough if you want to get valuable information in less time.
All the other bots are good and have their own valuable features but I can't see how anyone now would want to spend $380 on Snowie.

Messages In This Thread

• Backgame theory
  Michael Depreli -- Thursday, 29 October 2009, at 10:03 p.m.
  • Backgame theory
    Christian Munk-Christensen -- Friday, 30 October 2009, at 7:16 a.m.
    • Backgame theory
      Michael Depreli -- Friday, 30 October 2009, at 8:53 a.m.
      • Backgame theory
        Christian Munk-Christensen -- Friday, 30 October 2009, at 10:00 a.m.
  • Backgame theory BOT DATA
    Michael Depreli -- Friday, 30 October 2009, at 2:58 p.m.
    • Backgame theory BOT DATA
      Christian Munk-Christensen -- Friday, 30 October 2009, at 4:25 p.m.
      • Backgame theory BOT DATA
        eXtreme Gammon -- Friday, 30 October 2009, at 4:36 p.m.
      • Backgame theory BOT DATA
        mtuhtan -- Friday, 30 October 2009, at 4:46 p.m.
      • Backgame theory BOT DATA
        Michael Depreli -- Friday, 30 October 2009, at 4:47 p.m.
    • Backgame theory BOT DATA: Longer RO
      eXtreme Gammon -- Saturday, 31 October 2009, at 3:46 a.m.
      • Backgame theory continuation
        Michael Depreli -- Saturday, 31 October 2009, at 12:39 p.m.
        • Backgame theory continuation Correction
          Michael Depreli -- Saturday, 31 October 2009, at 3:36 p.m.
          • Backgame theory continuation Ignore this thread.
            Michael Depreli -- Saturday, 31 October 2009, at 7:47 p.m.
            • Backgame theory continuation Ignore this thread.
              Frank Berger -- Saturday, 31 October 2009, at 9:37 p.m.
        • Backgame theory continuation
          neilkaz -- Sunday, 1 November 2009, at 3:51 p.m.
          • Backgame theory continuation
            Michael Depreli -- Sunday, 1 November 2009, at 4:08 p.m.
      • Backgame theory BOT DATA: Longer RO
        Ian Shaw -- Saturday, 31 October 2009, at 7:35 p.m.
        • Backgame theory BOT DATA: Longer RO
          neilkaz -- Saturday, 31 October 2009, at 9:38 p.m.
  • Backgame theory
    Timothy Chow -- Saturday, 31 October 2009, at 1:18 a.m.
    • Backgame theory
      Phil Simborg -- Monday, 2 November 2009, at 4:00 a.m.
      • Backgame theory
        Timothy Chow -- Monday, 2 November 2009, at 1:53 p.m.
  • Did this position come from the last set of 10 I rolled out for you? *NM*
    neilkaz -- Saturday, 31 October 2009, at 9:56 p.m.
    • Did this position come from the last set of 10 I rolled out for you?
      Michael Depreli -- Sunday, 1 November 2009, at 10:07 a.m.
      • Did this position come from the last set of 10 I rolled out for you?
        neilkaz -- Sunday, 1 November 2009, at 3:02 p.m.
        • Did this position come from the last set of 10 I rolled out for you?
          Michael Depreli -- Sunday, 1 November 2009, at 3:41 p.m.